Mormonism and White Supremacy: The Case of Steven Epperson

            Joanna Brooks’ Mormonism and White Supremacy: American Religion and the Problem of Racial Innocence (Oxford University Press, 2020) has given me new ways to think about Steven Epperson’s review of McConkie’s and Millet’s book Our Destiny and BYU’s subsequent investigation and decision to fire him. “This book,” Brooks tells readers with her first sentence, “seeks to instigate soul-searching—academic, institutional, and personal—on the matter of how American Christianity has contributed to white supremacy.” With its historical priesthood ban for supposed black-skinned descendants of Cain, Mormonism provides a disturbing case history. The story grows most interesting for me when Brooks addresses the official silence on the issue after the 1978 revelation that extended the priesthood to Black men, a troubling unwillingness to wrestle with a racist past. “To maintain control over the narrative,” she writes, “the institutional LDS Church and Mormon culture repressed internal critique and dissent. In place of critical self-examination, the LDS Church has used multiculturalism, rhetorical evasion, and duplicity to manage the legacy of Mormon anti-Black racism without taking responsibility for it.”

Steven’s review took up the responsibility his leaders were shirking. “Is it possible,” he asked, “just when the LDS community is emerging from ethnic, linguistic, and geographical parochialism to become a world-wide religion, that Our Destiny would unwittingly turn us back?” The question was doubly potent given the status of the authors and of the press that published the book (Deseret Book, as I write, still offers an eBook version of Our Destiny for sale). BYU Professor of Religion and author of more than two dozen books, Joseph Fielding McConkie, was the son of apostle Bruce McConkie and of the daughter of President Joseph Fielding Smith. Robert Millet was Dean of Religious Education at BYU and author of a series of books that eventually numbered more than sixty. 

That Mormon writers would claim literal blood descent from Abraham earned by valiance in pre-mortal life and giving them rights to the priesthood and thus prospects of hierarchical advantages in the next life is not surprising. Such racist claims had been made by many Church leaders since Brigham Young, including Joseph McConkie’s father-in-law Joseph Fielding Smith, whose book The Way to Perfection spoke of the curse of Cain and of his descendants (people whose black skin marked them with the curse), and by Joseph McConkie’s father, Bruce McConkie whose Mortal Messiah claimed that Jews were cursed for rejecting Christ (explaining the suffering of millions of Jews over the centuries) and whose Mormon Doctrine explained that Blacks were denied the priesthood because of lack of valiance in the pre-mortal existence. But the 1978 revelation extending the priesthood to Black men should have ended that. Bruce McConkie said as much in a devotional address at BYU on August 18, 1978 titled “All Are Alike unto God”:

We have read these passages and their associated passages for many years. We . . . have said to ourselves, “Yes, it says that, but we must read out of it the taking of the gospel and the blessings of the temple to the Negro people, because they are denied certain things.” . . . We spoke with a limited understanding and without the light and knowledge that now has come into the world.

Still, Elder McConkie held on to the belief that Black men had been denied the priesthood until 1978 because God required it: 

 And the other underlying principle is that in the eternal providences of the Lord, the time had come for extending the gospel to a race and a culture to whom it had previously been denied, at least as far as all of its blessings are concerned. So it was a matter of faith and righteousness and seeking on the one hand, and it was a matter of the divine timetable on the other hand. The time had arrived when the gospel, with all its blessings and obligations, should go to the Negro.

Our Destiny, fifteen years later, continued the racist story. 

            Joanna Brooks’ book, however, raises questions about the institutional non-response to Our Destiny. Why didn’t someone at Deseret Book, owned by the Church, say: no, we’re no longer in the business of publishing racist ideas? Why didn’t the General Authority members of the BYU Board of Trustees say: no, we are trying to move on from our institutional racism and this book works against that? And most interesting for Steven Epperson’s case, why didn’t BYU administrators, at the latest when Steven’s review appeared in BYU Studies in 1996, call in the Dean of Religious Education and the Professor of Ancient Scripture and require them to recall their book and to publicly recant its racist ideas? Instead, Joseph McConkie’s uncle Oscar (senior partner representing the LDS Church for the firm Kirton McConkie) threatened legal action. Instead, BYU administrators submitted Steven’s book Mormons and Jews for review and asked what he would do if it were found to doctrinally unsound. Instead, BYU administrators summarily fired Steven because, they said, his Bishop would not endorse his worthiness. They should have promoted him and offered him tenure for his service.

About Scott Abbott

I received my Ph.D. in German Literature from Princeton University in 1979. Then I taught at Vanderbilt University, BYU, and Utah Valley State College. At Utah Valley University, I directed the Program in Integrated Studies for its initial 13 years and was also Chair of the Department of Humanities and Philosophy for three years. My publications include a book on Freemasonry and the German Novel, two co-authored books with Zarko Radakovic (REPETITIONS and VAMPIRES & A REASONABLE DICTIONARY, published in Serbo-Croatian in Belgrade and in English with Punctum Books), a book with Sam Rushforth (WILD RIDES AND WILDFLOWERS, Torrey House Press), a "fraternal meditation" called IMMORTAL FOR QUITE SOME TIME (University of Utah Press), and translations of three books by Austrian author Peter Handke, of an exhibition catalogue called "The German Army and Genocide," and, with Dan Fairbanks, of Gregor Mendel's important paper on hybridity in peas. More famously, my children are in the process of creating good lives for themselves: as a model and dance/yoga studio manager, as a teacher of Chinese language, as an ecologist and science writer, as a jazz musician, as a parole officer, as a contractor, as a seasonal worker (Alaska and Park City, Utah), and as parents. I share my life with UVU historian Lyn Bennett, with whom I have written a cultural history of barbed wire -- THE PERFECT FENCE (Texas A&M University Press). Some publications at http://works.bepress.com/scott_abbott/
Gallery | This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Mormonism and White Supremacy: The Case of Steven Epperson

  1. alex caldiero says:

    strange bedfellows: mormonism and racism. complex. mysterious. can you imagine my dismay . shortly after joining the Church discovering the thing with the blacks the curse of Cain etc. somethings that must’ve slipped past in the missionary discussions. but being a true believer and still am (we are a minority) i went to see my stake president who confirmed my worse fears and god bless him suggested i should pray about it which i did for the holy spirit wd reveal the truth, after all it was the holy spirit that revealed the truth that the church is true. so went and prayed about it and having gotten a confirmation by the spirit i went back to the stake president and told him that it was revealed to me that Brigham young was a racist. now what? end of discussion. problem solved. for by the power of the spirit ye shall know the truth of all things.

    Like

    • Scott Abbott says:

      heartbreaking, Alex. in Princeton I used to teach the “Gospel Essentials” class for investigators. the Bishop told me one day that the missionaries had complained I was telling the class members that we believed we had a Mother in Heaven. That’s one of the best parts of our theology, I said. He agreed. On the flip side, the racist absurdities begun by Brigham Young were one of the worst parts of the theology. Somewhere on the Church’s internet site there’s an article that admits Brigham Young was a racist, but no one, as far as I know, has wrestled with that over the pulpit in General Conference. so people like Millet and McConkie can still peddle their racist bullshit

      Like

  2. yanagringo says:

    A powerful crystallization of both a structure of kinship and power as well as unyielding supremacist ideas. Thank you, Scott.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Reading Notes | THE GOALIE'S ANXIETY

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s